View Issue Details
| Category | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSPBT：本体(SSP) | |||||
| Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||
| Status | closed | ||||
| Summary | 0000326: OnOverlap does not fire when characters stop overlapping | ||||
| Description | Related to issue 0000310 The change to OnOverlap is good and is definitely helpful for what I'm trying to do. I noticed that Ukadoc says that it should be possible to detect when characters are no longer overlapping by checking the contents of reference1, which I'm guessing means it's supposed to fire when characters stop overlapping as well. (I am running Ukadoc through machine translation though, so my information might not be fully accurate.) In my testing, OnOverlap only seems to fire when at least one pair of characters is overlapping, which prevents me from using reference1 to tell if the characters are no longer overlapping. I think this may have been true in previous versions as well, but I didn't realize it then... | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Attach Tags | |||||
|
|
OnOverlap Reference0: **current** overlap status Reference1: **previous** overlap status (overlap status 1 step before) So, if you want to catch events when \0 and \1 windows are separated (not overlapped), check "0-1" string exist in Reference1, and **not exist** in Reference0. In my testing, above concept still valid after issue 310 is fixed. OnOverlap event may fire when overlapping status is changed, so it may fire when overlapping pairs count changed from 1 to 0 or 0 to 1. That's why this event occured at least 1 pair is ovelapping or overlapped. |
|
|
This is very strange, the event seems to be working properly for me now, even though I swear when I reported this it was not firing when the characters stopped overlapping. Either I completely misread the output from Tama when I was debugging, or restarting my computer a second time (even though it had just been restarted when I reported) fixed it. Either way, my apologies; this issue can be closed. If this happens to me again, I'll see if I can gather any further info to report... |
|
|
closed |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-15 15:20 | guest | New Issue | |
| 2021-10-15 16:34 | ponapalt | Relationship added | related to 0000310 |
| 2021-10-17 09:55 | ponapalt | Assigned To | => ponapalt |
| 2021-10-17 09:55 | ponapalt | Status | new => feedback |
| 2021-10-17 09:55 | ponapalt | Note Added: 0000833 | |
| 2021-10-17 09:56 | ponapalt | Note Edited: 0000833 | |
| 2021-10-17 09:57 | ponapalt | Note Edited: 0000833 | |
| 2021-10-17 09:57 | ponapalt | Note Edited: 0000833 | |
| 2021-10-17 10:00 | ponapalt | Note Edited: 0000833 | |
| 2021-10-17 10:03 | ponapalt | Note Edited: 0000833 | |
| 2021-10-17 10:51 | guest | Note Added: 0000834 | |
| 2021-10-17 10:51 | guest | Status | feedback => assigned |
| 2021-10-18 12:56 | ponapalt | Status | assigned => closed |
| 2021-10-18 12:56 | ponapalt | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2021-10-18 12:56 | ponapalt | Note Added: 0000838 |
