View Issue Details
| Category | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSPBT：本体(SSP) | |||||
| Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A | ||
| Status | closed | ||||
| Fixed in Version | 2.5 (リリース) | ||||
| Summary | 0000284: improve the specification | ||||
| Description | When I was building yatama I ran into a problem: as far as I know there is no way for external programs to know what ghosts are currently available Also the sstp sender cannot decide which ghost is harvesting the sstp So I'd like to improve the specification in this area | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Attach Tags | |||||
|
|
This is my current draft EXECUTE SSTP/1.4 Charset: UTF-8 Sender: text Command: GetGhostInfo SSTP/1.0 200 OK Reference0: ghost_name1 Reference1: ghost_name2 //... ghost_name1_path: xxxxx ghost_name1_icon_path: xxxxx ghost_name1_hwnd: xxxxx ghost_name2_path: xxxxx ghost_name2_icon_path: xxxxx ghost_name2_hwnd: xxxxx and for any SSTP: ToGhost: ghost_name |
|
|
an add for convenient: EXECUTE SSTP/1.4 Charset: UTF-8 Sender: text Command: GetGhostInfo SSTP/1.0 200 OK //... ghost_num: 2 |
|
|
Please check this document. http://ssp.shillest.net/ukadoc/manual/spec_fmo_mutex.html It's old specification based on other ukagaka software. |
|
|
for any SSTP: ToGhost: ghost_name I think this feature needs to be implemented Of course I'm not in a hurry, yatama is currently stuck, so feel free to do as you please, this can be given the lowest priority |
|
|
Please use IfGhost header instead. Below is old document (and invalid TLS warning due to server problem) but still valid. https://www.ooyashima.net/db/sstp.html |
|
|
Is there a problem with my understanding? In my understanding IfGhost only assigns a conversation to a specific ghost, it does not allow only a specific ghost to receive this sstp |
|
|
If you want to send event or other SSTP commands to specific ghost, DirectSSTP with FMO is 1st choice. You can target ghost freely using HWND, because FMO hwnd = \0 window of ghost, and SSP can select target ghost easily using HWND information. If you can't use DirectSSTP (WM_COPYDATA) and using socket SSTP only, SSP can still reroute SSTP target automatically when IfGhost header exists. But this mechanism is not stable method. |
|
|
Thank you! I think this issue can be closed, I'll try to implement FMO and DirectSSTP related wrappers after I'm done with some realistic and extremely annoying things XD |
|
|
closed |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 11:21 | guest | New Issue | |
| 2021-09-18 11:30 | ponapalt | Assigned To | => ponapalt |
| 2021-09-18 11:30 | ponapalt | Status | new => assigned |
| 2021-09-18 11:30 | ponapalt | Relationship added | related to 0000274 |
| 2021-09-18 12:05 | guest | Note Added: 0000683 | |
| 2021-09-18 12:16 | guest | Note Added: 0000684 | |
| 2021-09-21 21:36 | ponapalt | Status | assigned => closed |
| 2021-09-21 21:36 | ponapalt | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2021-09-21 21:36 | ponapalt | Note Added: 0000690 | |
| 2021-09-21 21:39 | ponapalt | Fixed in Version | => 2.5 (リリース) |
| 2021-09-23 17:52 | guest | Status | closed => feedback |
| 2021-09-23 17:52 | guest | Resolution | fixed => reopened |
| 2021-09-23 17:52 | guest | Note Added: 0000697 | |
| 2021-09-25 18:10 | ponapalt | Note Added: 0000700 | |
| 2021-09-25 19:26 | guest | Note Added: 0000706 | |
| 2021-09-25 19:26 | guest | Status | feedback => assigned |
| 2021-09-25 20:07 | ponapalt | Note Added: 0000707 | |
| 2021-09-25 21:19 | guest | Note Added: 0000708 | |
| 2021-09-25 21:52 | ponapalt | Status | assigned => closed |
| 2021-09-25 21:52 | ponapalt | Note Added: 0000709 |
